The sorting hat

11:30 PM

Author | Andrea Knittel

Or, thinking about the residency application process

Right before I finished my last rotation of M3 year, I had the opportunity to attend a dinner hosted by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology for prospective residency applicants. It was a great chance to say hello again to the residents and faculty I worked with on my rotation and to learn a bit more about the application process. These sorts of events are often overwhelming and sometimes cryptic, but I was particularly struck by the reassurances from many of the faculty.

"Come talk to us, we will help you make a list that will work for you."

"People who come and talk to us are happy with their matches. We can help you identify the right programs."

"No, there isn't another way to find good programs. Come talk to us."

I left feeling like there was a sorting hat that would sit on my head, discern my clinical grades and Step 1 score, geographical and program-type preferences, and spit out a list of 15-20 programs to which I should apply. While this seems a little fantastic, it is closer to true than you might imagine. Having met now with three faculty members to talk about this process, I've come away with three fairly comprehensive lists of programs to consider.

For those of you not already familiar with this process (and those of you who are can skip to the next paragraph), the residency selection process is a match. Students submit applications through a central application system, and much like many other application processes, schools that are interested in particular candidates can offer them interviews. The similarity with most systems stops there, however. After the interviews, each applicant makes a rank list of programs and each program makes a rank list of applicants. These lists are fed to a computer algorithm that matches applicants and programs. The result it spits out is legally binding for one year. Because of this process, the list of program list an applicants starts with is important – there is only one application/interview cycle so there is no (easy*) way to go back and apply if one's rank list seems a little thin or the match doesn't go well.

As I'm looking over all of my lists, I'm wishing that there really were a sorting hat that could spit out a definitive set of options, but there aren't, and honestly, I feel pretty lucky just to have a good sense of what specialty I'm entering and what I'm looking for in a program. I've created a spreadsheet (cue either scary or optimistic music, depending on your perspective), and am looking forward to doing a little sorting of my own.

*I should note that if an applicant doesn't match, then there is a second small match that used to be referred to as the Scramble, where applicants re-apply for program spots that have been left unfilled. This doesn't happen often at Michigan, and certainly isn't the best way to get the match of your dreams as the most desirable spots are already taken, but can yield an acceptable outcome for all involved.

Media Contact Public Relations

Department of Communication at Michigan Medicine

[email protected]

734-764-2220

Stay Informed

Want top health & research news weekly? Sign up for Health Lab’s newsletters today!

Subscribe
Featured News & Stories
Department News
Congratulations to Gregg Myers!
Gregg (Khoriaty lab) successfully defended his thesis, "Identifying and Validating Novel Regulators of Erythroid Differentiation," on Thursday, April 17, 2025.
A fluorescence micrograph of mouse colon
Department News
What we do in M&I: A gutsy dive into the microbiome
Have you ever wondered about the hidden microbial world inside your gut? Dive into the fascinating study of the molecules that fuel our energy or learn how a high fiber diet can do wonders for your gut. From the life-saving early detection of colon cancer to finding possible treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases and C diff. infection, M&I cutting-edge research is transforming our understanding of the biology that impacts our health and is shaping the future of healthcare.
Smiling portrait of Philip and Myrna Fischer standing together in a formal setting.
Philanthropy News
Benjamin M. Hampstead Named Philip B. and Myrna R. Fischer Research Professor of Neurology
Benjamin Hampstead, Ph.D., the Philip B. and Myrna R. Fischer Research Professor of Neurology at U-M, advances Alzheimer's disease research.
drawing on orange background of colorful pills floating with body parts in them in pain
Health Lab
Cerebral palsy medications given to adults may not match needs
Prescribing medications that treat the most obvious parts of adult cerebral palsy pain and symptoms without examining for the underlying cause is a common experience for adults with cerebral palsy. This means that proper treatment is being overlooked and these medications can cause further complications later in life.
Department News
Congratulations to Sarah Steiner
Congratulations to Sarah (Pierre Coulombe Lab) on her induction into the U-M chapter of the Edward Alexander Bouchet Graduate Honor Society.
two older people taking blood pressure over breakfast
Health Lab
To keep high risk patients out of hospitals, at-home monitoring shows promise
Remote patient monitoring at home was associated with a major reduction in hospitalization in high risk patients.